Our reсent Case Studies
From Chaos to Scalable Quality
To build a scalable and sustainable foundation for quality — establishing structured QA processes, launching automation, and preparing the team for growth without compromising release stability.
|
Phase 1: Audit & QA Strategy 85_671033-c0> |
2 weeks 85_11aadf-b6> |
|
Phase 2: Implementation & Process Integration 85_f91ad9-33> |
4 weeks 85_c4b35f-a0> |
|
Phase 3: Automation Roadmap & Test Management Activation 85_1f892b-16> |
6 weeks 85_a6485d-06> |
|
Phase 4: Ongoing Support & Quality Scaling 85_adf5e6-5f> |
7 weeks 85_65df22-77> |
30% off
Escaped Bugs Reduction
15% off
Fewer Hotfixes and Rollbacks
IN PROGRESS
Vp Rnd
From ad-hoc testing to a structured QA foundation
To transform testing from a scattered, ad-hoc activity into a structured, owned, and trackable quality process — enabling Factify to support product growth and meet startup delivery speed without risking regressions or production issues.
|
Phase 1: Audit & QA Strategy 85_9af906-cb> |
2 weeks 85_546226-2a> |
|
Phase 2: Test Management Setup & Ownership Alignment 85_76c0a9-85> |
1.5 weeks 85_1864d6-5c> |
|
Phase 3: Automation Planning & Onboarding to Qase 85_54db37-b8> |
2 weeks 85_240192-42> |
|
Phase 4: Quality Coaching & Release Readiness Process 85_fd65d8-8e> |
ongoing 85_23a7de-b8> |
EARLY RESULTS
- Internal visibility into quality status on every build
- Reduced testing-related delays in releases
- 1st step into automation with a sustainable plan
- QA tasks became part of team planning and delivery
IN PROGRESS
- Test automation implementation
- Quality metrics tracking to begin in next sprint cycles.
Revolutionizing QA across a multi-app ecosystem
The company had no automation framework. Frontend teams tried building one, but lacked QA expertise. The product suite was complex:
- Unified automation framework – one codebase for mobile, web, and API tests
- Reusable infra (NPM package) – shared layer for standardization & easy updates
- Modular product layers – isolated per app, but consistent in logic
- Executive reporting – filtered by product line
- Team enablement – onboarded devs, aligned QA best practices, broke knowledge silos
Impact
- Manual regression effort ↓ 80%
- QA cycle time ↓ 60%
- CI feedback in 10 min / PR
- Zero job queueing under load
- Unified QA standards across 6 platforms
- Diagnostic validation module – compares algorithm output to ground-truth datasets
- CI on Kubernetes – dynamic pods spin up on demand
- 10-min feedback loops per PR – faster iteration, lower risk
Impact
- Manual regression effort ↓ 80%
- QA cycle time ↓ 60%
- CI feedback in 10 min / PR
- Zero job queueing under load
- Unified QA standards across 6 platforms
Оptimizing automation stability & speed: data, websockets & smart infrastructure
The QA team had solid automation coverage and well-documented processes, but they were still dealing with test flakiness, slow environment setup, and maintenance overhead.
Impact
- Test execution time ↓ 45%
- Maintenance workload ↓ 30%
- Locator-related failures ↓ 65%
- WebSocket testing now fast & stable
- Binaries & browser management overhead ↓ 80%
From bottlenecks to breakthrough: Reinventing test automation for a global messaging platform
Impact:
- New test creation time ↓ >70%
- Maintenance effort ↓ ~50%
- Execution and analysis time ↓ ~75%
- Device cost overhead ↓ ~65%
- Onboarding time ↓ 80%
Impact:
- New test creation time ↓ >70%
- Maintenance effort ↓ ~50%
- Execution and analysis time ↓ ~75%
- Device cost overhead ↓ ~65%
- Onboarding time ↓ 80%
Agent-Powered QA for a Lean Insurtech Startup
The constraints:
Quality risks were growing – but the team couldn’t afford to slow down.
System Highlights:
80% of repetitive scenarios were delegated to the agent – freeing QA to focus on what matters.
IMPACT
- Test coverage ↑ by 50%
(from 30% to 80%) - Code freeze time ↓ by 80%
(from 2 days to 4 hours) - Manual QA hours ↓ by 66%
(from 30/week to 10/week)
WHAT’S NEXT:
We’re integrating the QA agent into CI:
- Tests triggered on PR merge/nightly builds
- Fully headless in containers
- Reports sent to Slack with screenshots
No Cypress. No scripts. Just results.
Bypassing the UI: fast, stable QA for a Legacy FinTech platform
IMPACT:
- Test execution time ↓ 83%
- (from 2h 50m → 29 min)
- Maintenance effort ↓ ~60%
(less brittle code, fewer false positives) - Time to delivery: solution shipped in just 25 days
IMPACT:
- Test execution time ↓ 83%
- (from 2h 50m → 29 min)
- Maintenance effort ↓ ~60%
(less brittle code, fewer false positives) - Time to delivery: solution shipped in just 25 days
Preparation for Technical Due Diligence: Performance Testing for a Real-Time Influencer Commerce Platform
A real-time influencer commerce platform was preparing for launch in just 30 days. Investors demanded proof of scalability.
Key constraints:IMPACT:
- Checkout P95 latency ↓ from 4.6s → 1.1s
- Error rate ↓ from 17% → <0.8%
- Stream latency ↓ from 2.9s → <500ms
- Test run cost ↓ from $85 → $19
IMPACT:
- Checkout P95 latency ↓ from 4.6s → 1.1s
- Error rate ↓ from 17% → <0.8%
- Stream latency ↓ from 2.9s → <500ms
- Test run cost ↓ from $85 → $19
Industries
We deliver expertise across diverse domains – from web, API, and mobile applications to complex solutions such as embedded tech and algorithm validation. Our experience spans multiple industries, including:



